Using household panel data for Australia, sourced from HILDA, we test whether the hypothesis of constant relative risk aversion in wealth, controlling for various sociodemographic variables. Our measure of risk is based on the proportion of variance of the optimal household portfolio rather than the proportion of risky assets in the portfolio. Based on this measure, we apply a first differences model across three survey waves spanning 2002 to 2010. We find strong evidence that Australian households exhibit decreasing relative risk aversion in wealth rejecting the constant relative risk aversion hypothesis.This finding is robust in the presence of various sociodemographic variables, including education levels and liquidity constraints.
JEL Codes: D14, D81, G11
Total Reviews: 0
Price:$9.99
March 2020 (International Review of Business Research Papers) → Ethical Factors Affecting the Financial Market: A Study from Bangladesh Perspectives
March 2020 (International Review of Business Research Papers) → Female Labor Force Participation with Adverse Shocks: The Case of Rural Households in Bangladesh
September 2016 (Journal of Modern Science and Technology) → Cost Effective Decisions on Service Rate at a Customer Care Centre with Multi-Server Queuing Model
September 2017 (International Review of Business Research Papers) → Remittance, Exchange Rate and Dutch Disease: The Case of Bangladesh
$9.99
July 2015 (Journal of Business and Policy Research) → Perceived Importance of Defensive Marketing Strategies Before and After Competitor Entry: Does Nationality Matter?
$9.99
Reviews
There are no reviews yet.