Prior research has documented both positive (John and Litov, 2009) and negative (Berger, Ofek, and Yermack, 1997) relationships between managerial entrenchment and the use of debt. This paper further investigates the impact of corporate governance on firm’s leverage by taking into account the substitution effect of different governance mechanisms. Consistent with John and Litov (2009), we find that antitakeover provisions have a positive effect on firm’s leverage. However, this effect disappears when we control for the interaction effect between antitakeover provisions and board power, measured by board independence. More specifically, we find that entrenched managers operate highly leveraged firms only if they are exposed to powerful boards. The result on this positive relationship between firm’s leverage and the interaction of board power and antitakeover provisions continues to hold even after we consider other governance variables.
Field of Research: Finance
Key Words: Antitakeover Provisions, Board Power, Firm Leverage
JEL Codes: G32 and G34
Total Reviews: 0
Price:$9.99
March 2020 (International Review of Business Research Papers) → Ethical Factors Affecting the Financial Market: A Study from Bangladesh Perspectives
March 2020 (International Review of Business Research Papers) → Female Labor Force Participation with Adverse Shocks: The Case of Rural Households in Bangladesh
September 2016 (Journal of Modern Science and Technology) → Cost Effective Decisions on Service Rate at a Customer Care Centre with Multi-Server Queuing Model
September 2017 (International Review of Business Research Papers) → Remittance, Exchange Rate and Dutch Disease: The Case of Bangladesh
$9.99
July 2015 (Journal of Business and Policy Research) → Perceived Importance of Defensive Marketing Strategies Before and After Competitor Entry: Does Nationality Matter?
$9.99
Reviews
There are no reviews yet.